Meta Ads for businesses already making sales. Written rules, an open dashboard and everything in your name.

That I applied the rules on this page with a client's money and it came out at 5.47 ROAS. Volume — the thing you're worried about — I've operated with my own money: in my own stores I reached €9,250 of ad spend in a single day and €261,770 in sales in a month. It's in the proof section, with its screenshots and its limits written underneath. What I don't yet have is a client case at your scale published with permission; when I have it, it goes up top. In the meantime I'll show you whatever you need on a screen-share in the call, and if that's not enough to decide, that's a sensible criterion and I won't argue with it.

In none, if you measure it as a percentage of spend: with the minimum spend my fee equals or exceeds it, and the sum is in the pricing section, not hidden. The real comparison isn't against 'an agency at 15%' — at 15% of your spend at this size nobody competent will work — it's against a freelancer at $450–800 or against your own hours. The freelancer is cheaper. You hire me if what you want is what they don't usually put in writing: cut rules published before launch, tracking reconciled event by event, a weekly report with the bad news inside and every asset in your name from day one. If they give you that, keep them. I mean it, and knowing it now saves us both the third meeting.

The names: because they're identifiable businesses and their name is theirs, not mine. Without signed authorisation I publish neither brand nor quote, and I'm not going to fill the gap with first names, little stars and stock-photo faces, which you'd spot instantly. I'm asking for those authorisations. Mine is up: in Who I am, with my name under it. What exists today, in full and with its source, is the proof section: one client case with its dashboard, one experiment with my own money and the gap admitted in writing.

Straight answer: pursuing a Dubai free-zone company through the courts from abroad is expensive and slow, and anyone who tells you otherwise is dressing up the risk. That's why the contract isn't your only protection, and why the structure is built so you don't have to trust my jurisdiction: you pay month by month — your maximum exposure is the three-month minimum and you know it before signing —, the account, the pixel, the website and the data are yours from day one — if I vanish tomorrow, you keep everything except me —, and the rules to measure me against are published on this page. Add the trade licence by email the same day you ask for it, and an invoice from a real entity with full details. It's more verification than most agencies give you before charging you; the jurisdictional risk that remains is real, it is this one, and you decide whether my structure compensates for it.

The invoice comes from ECOM OLIMPO - FZCO, a real entity with full details, and with no VAT charged on it. If your business is in the EU or the UK, the most likely treatment is a service from a supplier outside your country with the VAT self-accounted — the reverse charge — but I'm not your tax adviser: with the proposal you get the exact wording in writing for your accountant to confirm before you sign, and if your accountant wants to talk it through, they write to me and I answer myself.

Results, no — and this is the most important answer on the page. I control the process: the structure, the creatives, the cut rules, reconciled measurement and the weekly review. That I commit to in writing, and you can audit me against this very page. I don't control the market, the algorithm, your supplier or how much your competitor spends next month: promising you a ROAS would turn an obligation of means into an obligation of result, and it would be lying to you. You've been promised ROAS before; you know how that ends. What I will do: if in the diagnostic I don't see enough margin, I tell you and I don't charge you.

What's already public: the minimum commitment is three months because below that no figure means anything, ad spend already spent doesn't come back — it went to the market, not to me — and the asset handover is described in the 'Everything in your name' section: whenever you leave, you leave with everything. The exact cancellation terms go in the contract and you read them in full before signing anything.

Yes, because the €50 test doesn't decide what you sell: it decides which ad and which angle deserve budget. With your own catalogue no product gets picked from any library: we pick the angles of your catalogue, cut them at €40–50 without a signal and scale what performs. I'm not going to propose swapping your brand for whatever is being advertised this week, and I don't need you to touch your logistics. And the opposite too, said plainly: I don't teach people to build businesses from scratch and I don't sell training. I work for businesses that want the work done, not explained.

Only Meta. Google Ads, Microsoft and LinkedIn I don't run: all my measured experience is on Meta and I'm not going to fake what I don't have. If your main channel is search, I'm not your supplier, and telling you here costs me less than you finding it out while paying me.

Decisions run on accumulated spend, not on the calendar: the first cut comes at €40–50 per test. But look at the distribution in the case in the proof section: three nearly flat weeks before almost everything landed in seven days. If you need to see a return in 30 days or less, don't hire me; you'll end up frustrated and I'll end up looking bad.